DECEMBER 3, 1947
GENEVA—Perhaps one of the most interesting subjects to be considered in discussing the question of nationalizing American railroads is how they are now regulated and how their taxes are distributed.
They operate under both Federal and State regulations, and they are also affected by city ordinances. The first regulatory Interstate Commerce Act was passed in 1887. Its purpose was to prevent discrimination. Laws and regulations are now concerned with freight and passenger rates, the publication of tariffs relating thereto, hours of service, safety standards, minimum wages, accounting, working conditions of employees, and so on.
No stocks and bonds can be issued, no railroad can acquire other railroads, new rail lines cannot be built and old ones cannot be abandoned without the authority of the Interstate Commerce Commission. Railroads are still regulated as a monopoly even though they now compete with many other types of transportation.So much for regulation. * * * Railroad taxes may be divided into three general groups: Federal normal income, surtax, and excess profit taxes.Taxes for pensions, social security, etc.State and local taxes on physical property, franchise taxes, excise, license and miscellaneous taxes, as well as state income taxes.
The annual tax bill of the railroads depends upon earnings. The taxes of Class I railroads prior to World War II varied from $237,000,000 to $396,000,000 a year. Naturally, during the war their taxes soared, but even in 1946 they were only a little short of $500,000,000. In many counties, railroads are the largest taxpayers. In 1946, Class I railroads paid $2.13 in taxes for every $1 paid in dividends.
* * *
There is a trend towards consolidation of railroads just as there is in every other business in our country, but it goes on under careful regulation.
It is easy to see that it is competition which is the incentive for improvement of all private enterprise. If the railroads were owned by the Government, this incentive would disappear. And operation under the Government would be bound to have some political taint.
The main reason why I have chosen to look into railroads is because obviously nationalization in this field would be the entering wedge to widespread nationalization of industry. The Government would not be likely to permit competition from other forms of transport, and would therefore be prone to nationalize not only transportation but some of the essential elements which enter into the functioning of transportation.
Our country is very large, and we still have conditions which make it seem probable that, under private ownership, the railroads can be better and more cheaply run and can furnish the Government—Federal, State and local—with a substantial amount in revenue. In a later column, however, I shall cover the arguments in favor of nationalization, as presented by a labor leader.
(WORLD COPYRIGHT, 1947, BY UNITED FEATURE SYNDICATE, INC.; REPRODUCTION IN WHOLE OR IN PART PROHIBITED.)
Names Mentioned or Referenced
- Marshall Plan
[ LC ]
- Geneva (Switzerland)
About this document
My Day by Eleanor Roosevelt, December 3, 1947
Digital edition created by The Eleanor Roosevelt Papers Project The George Washington University Old Main Building, Suite 406 1951 F Street, NW Washington, DC 20052
- Brick, Christopher (Editor)
- Regenhardt, Christy (Associate Editor)
- Black, Allida M. (Editor)
- Binker, Mary Jo (Associate Editor)
- Alhambra, Christopher C. (Electronic Text Editor)
Digital edition published 2008, 2017 by
The Eleanor Roosevelt Papers Project
Available under licence from the Estate of Anna Eleanor Roosevelt.
Published with permission from the Estate of Anna Eleanor Roosevelt.
MEP edition publlished on 2008-06-30
TEI-P5 edition published on 2017-04-28
Transcription created from a photocopy of a UFS wire copy of a My Day column instance
archived at the Franklin D. Roosevelt Library.
TMs, AERP, FDRL