THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA-
Consolidating its Space Power, Enhancing its Military Might
Lawrence Cooper
Corinne Contant
China is one of the largest countries in
the world, with the world's largest population and one of the fastest
growing economies. Despite its immense size, and recent economic and
technological growth, China's infrastructure, standard of living, and
access to services continue to make it a third world country. Over the
past several decades, China's communist government, the People's Republic
of China (PRC) has struggled with economic liberalization, and halting
steps toward partial democratization. During this period, the PRC has also
been gradually modernizing its military, moving towards greater
technological prowess, and seeking to expand its influence on the world
stage. The PRC is incorporating high technology into its economy and
military, and developing space capabilities that have established its
status as one of a handful of space-faring nations. As in the United
States, many of China's space systems are dual-use in nature, intended to
strengthen China's economy as well as to support its military
capabilities.
THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA- AN INTRODUCTION
The People's Republic of China shares
borders with 15 other nations, including India, Mongolia, North Korea,
Pakistan, Russia, and Vietnam. At over 9.5 million sq. km, China is
slightly smaller than the United States, and suffers from a shortage of
arable land. China supports a population of more than 1.2 billion, making
it the world's most populous nation. Despite significant numbers of ethnic
minorities, Han Chinese make up almost 92% of the population. 1
The current communist government has
evolved considerably since the Chinese Communists, under the leadership of
Mao Tse Tung drove the Nationalist Party, or Goumindang, from the Mainland
to the island of Taiwan in 1949. The period following the formation of the
PRC was one of great turmoil. Women received more rights, agriculture and
basic industries were collectivized, while, at the same time, many
capitalists and suspected capitalists were fined, had their property
confiscated, or were executed. The Great Leap Forward program, which began
in the late 1950s, was intended to spur industrial, agricultural and
educational development. 2 The period from 1966 to 1976 (when Mao
died), the Cultural Revolution, was an era of dramatic and often violent
change in China. 3 It was a period of "re-education" on
communist principles, social upheaval, and mass terror, from which China
is still recovering.
In the late 1970's, China embarked on the
Four Modernizations championed by Deng Xiaoping. This program focused on
developing agriculture, industry, scientific and technological
capabilities, as well as defense enhancement. These steps were meant to
transform China into a modern socialist country by the end of the century.
4 The overall
goal of the Four Modernizations is the pursuit of what the Chinese call
"comprehensive national power," that is, the enhancement of China's
economic, military and political influence.
Following his rise to power, Deng Xiaoping
engineered several reforms, starting China's recent economic
reconstruction and expansion. In part as a result of these reforms,
China's gross national product grew at a pace of 9.2% in 1979 and
continues to see high growth rates today. 5 Reforms have included the relaxation of
state controls over the lives of private citizens, the opening of China's
economy to foreign investments, and the growth of the private sector.
While these reforms are significant, they only allowed incremental
increases in political freedoms. Advances in free speech and other forms
of open political expression have occurred in short stages, and the
government has retained the option to pullback in order to maintain
control. The 1989 crackdown in Tiananmen Square, after a flirtation with
more liberal political expression, is a prime illustration of the Chinese
leadership's commitment to maintaining strict control over its people, and
over the political shape of the nation. 6
CURRENT POLITICAL AND STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS
In accordance with the dictates of the
Four Modernizations, and its quest for Comprehensive National Power, the
PRC announced its central principles for security, which are: 1) common
security for all nations in the region, 2) cooperative security in which
nations refrain from trying to impose any set of values on others and with
no nation (China, Russia, Japan, or the United States) being permitted to
play the role of regional policeman, and 3) comprehensive security that
includes economic and military components. 7 Chinese national security doctrine favors a
balance of power in the region, and holds that long-term stability
requires an improvement in relations between regional powers. China
generally Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN), because ASEAN
unites its members in a way that weakens US regional influence, allows its
members to maintain a common front regarding human rights, and allows
China to play a confident, flexible, and responsible role in the area. 8 China has
worked to maximize its flexibility in dealing with regional issues, by
conducting political dialogues either via multilateral forums or via
direct country-to-country talks.
The South China Sea and the Spratly
IslandsChina has a major economic and strategic interest in the
South China Sea. Its actions have contributed to considerable tensions in
the region. These tensions are largely focused on the Spratly Islands, a
collection of small islands, atolls, and coral reefs. China, the
Philippines, Taiwan, Malaysia, Vietnam, and Brunei all claim partial or
total ownership of these islets. 9 Because of the rich fishing grounds and the
possibility of lucrative oil reserves, the islands' location in some of
the world's busiest shipping lanes, and the use of the islands as
defensive outposts, ownership is disputed. China has incrementally
advanced its presence in the island chain by building fortified outposts,
based on the claim that a Chinese Imperial Admiral visited the island
chain in the 15th century. 10 In 1988 China seized six reefs claimed by
Vietnam with military force. In subsequent clashes seventy-seven people
were killed and three Vietnamese ships were sunk. 11 China has also
established a fortified presence on Mischief Reef, only about one hundred
kilometers from the Philippines, and well within the 200-mile exclusive
economic zone claimed by the Philippines. China's Spratly encroachment
appears to relate directly to its aim of developing comprehensive national
power. Beijing's presence enables it to influence sea lines of trade and
communications, access to oil reserves, and enhance its status as a
regional power.
TaiwanThe disputed status of
the island of Taiwan has led to one of the greatest tensions in East Asia,
and is one of the most contentious issues between the United States and
China. The PRC has a long-standing desire to reclaim Taiwan as an integral
part of its One-China principle. The tension level has oscillated the
years since Mao and his forces drove the Nationalist forces from the
Mainland. From the mid-1990s on, tensions have been slowly building.
Tempers ran high during the 1996 Taiwanese Presidential election. At this
time, China fired long-range missiles near Taiwan, prompting the United
States to send two carrier task forces to the Taiwan Strait, to
demonstrate US interests in Taiwan.
While the United States recognizes the
PRC, not Taiwan, as the nation of China, it still maintains defensive
agreements with Taiwan under the Taiwan Relations Act. 12 De facto
recognition by the United States of, and defense commitments to, Taiwan
provoke China's ire, for China sees such actions as interference in an
internal issue between it and its "renegade province." In February 2000,
China issued a White Paper on the "One-China" Principle outlining its
argument for sovereignty over Taiwan. While the Chinese government
stresses its desire for peaceful reunification, it also lists the
circumstances under which it would take action. If any circumstance
separates Taiwan from China, a foreign power occupies Taiwan, or Taiwanese
authorities refuse to negotiate, China states that it will be "forced to
adopt all drastic measures possible, including the use of force..." 13 This is widely
taken to imply the possible use of nuclear weapons.
China particularly wants to prevent the
inclusion of Taiwan in a US-fielded Theater Ballistic Missile Defense
(TMD) system. TMD would potentially provide Taiwan with a defense against
China's threat of missile bombardment. China sees this and the US
Congress's Taiwan Security Enhancement Act, as serious infringements on
China's sovereignty, and unwarranted interference in internal affairs. 14 Recent
statements by US President Bush that that United States "would do whatever
it took to help Taiwan defend herself" against a Chinese attack have
increased China's concerns about US interference in Taiwanese-Chinese
relations, and heightened US-China tensions. 15
Taiwan's Presidential election in spring
2000 did little to ease tensions in the region. After the victory of
President Chen Shui-bian and his political party, China initially refused
to negotiate with the new government. China has tried to force the
reunification issue by holding out on talks until Chen agrees to the One
China-principle. Beijing adopted this stance despite Chen's efforts to
tone down his pro-independence rhetoric and his offers to discuss
reunification with the Mainland. 16 Since the election, President Chen
Shui-bian has tried to lower tensions by adopting more conciliatory
language related to the one-China principle. However, the PRC has so far
rejected Taiwanese overtures, retaining a hard-line stance that demands
total and unconditional Taiwanese acceptance of the One-China Principle.
The Korean PeninsulaAlthough
the fate of the Koreas does not directly impact China, it has a vested
interest in preventing the re-emergence of violence on the Korean
Peninsula. Not only has China long maintained a security pact with
Pyongyang, it has also, in recent years, garnered considerable economic
investment from South Korea. In 1996, trade between China and South Korea
totaled more than $20 billion and direct investment amounted to over $1.5
billion. 17
North Korea's 1998 launch of a rocket over Japan exacerbated tensions in
the region, and renewed Japan's interest in obtaining TMD technology. 18
China shares the desire for peace and
stability in the Koreas. However, it does not necessarily see the need for
reunification of the Koreas, and does not foresee such a reunification
occurring for several decades, if at all. A unified Korea could become a
power rival to China, while a more belligerent or uncooperative North
Korea could increase the US presence in the region, and assure TMD
deployment there. Should reunification occur, Beijing would prefer the
resultant Korea adopt a Chinese, rather than a Western (i.e., US)
orientation.
JapanChina and Japan share a
long and contentious history. Beijing's focus on Japan derives both from
this history and from the current special Japanese-US security
relationship. The Chinese are still mindful of Japan's military hegemony
and brutal conduct during World War Two. As well, Japan's security
relationship with the United States ensures an additional US presence
close to China. This diminishes China's ability to influence events in the
region. Recent developments in North Korea, including its development of
nuclear and missile technologies, have caused Japan to take a more active
military role in the region, and have revived Japanese interest in
increasing the island's military capabilities, even to the point of
potentially developing an offensive military force. Japan, for example,
has recently taken the step to develop a dedicated reconnaissance
satellite system.
China will carefully monitor Japanese
response to such possible events as a Chinese attack on Taiwan, or a North
Korean attack on South Korea. The PRC does not want to see either Japan's
expansion of its military or the development of TMD. 19 Either
Japanese military expansion or Japanese pursuit of a stronger US military
presence would counter China's influence in the region and potentially
affect its designs on Taiwan. China appreciates the economic gains
possible through an expanded relationship with Japan, and recognizes that
Japan may be in a better position that China to influence the US
development and deployment of missile defense. Any missile defense system
(either TMD or national Missile Defense) would degrade China's abilities
to project power in the region.
RussiaRussia and China have a
long-term on-again off-again relationship. After the birth of the People's
Republic of China, the Soviet Union provided significant support,
including Communist doctrine and direct economic aid for Chinese
industrialization, and substantial military assistance. However, the
failure of China's Great Leap Forward program, and the resultant doctrinal
disputes, sparked Sino-Soviet tensions. China's rejection of Soviet
methods irked Khrushchev and threatened the Soviet claim to leadership of
worldwide socialism. 20 The Soviet Union cooled to China, and
shortly thereafter refused to provide nuclear assistance. Later, the
Soviets withdrew all technical support from China.
The rift between the two countries lasted
until the mid-1980s. During this time, the Chinese even prepared for
possible war against the Soviet Union. Early in the Chinese nuclear
program (1955-1960), China received significant assistance from the USSR.
However, after the Sino-Soviet split (China ceased receiving military and
economic aid in 1960) Chinese nuclear weapons were developed in large part
to deter the USSR. After the thaw in Sino-Soviet relations in the
late-1980s, the Soviet Union (and later, Russia) provided China with more
modern arms, including advanced ships and aircraft. Russia has also
provided China with considerable support for the Chinese space program,
including the manned spacecraft Shenzhou. "Chinese astronauts have trained
in Russia, and the Russians are believed to have provided technical
assistance to Chinese scientists building the Shenzhou." 21 China is
believed to be developing a new, larger rocket that will be able to carry
larger payloads into orbit. Both the Russian Federation and other former
Soviet republics such as Ukraine have collaborated in space. Russia and
Ukraine's financial situations "makes them amenable to selling technology
which is otherwise not available to the Chinese." 22 Recently
Russia and China have established even closer political ties, taking
stances in the UN together against the United States, opposing US (and
NATO) actions in Kosovo, opposing US plans for missile defense, and
generally trying to counter US influence in international affairs.
THE CHINESE MILITARY - STRUCTURE, DOCTRINE AND TECHNOLOGIES
Over the past decade and a half, China's
military has received increased funding, developed more advanced weaponry,
and began operating more assertively, as seen by its actions in the
Spratly Islands and in the firing of rockets near Taiwan. 23 Chinese
reports indicate that between 1986 and 1997 the military budget rose 150%.
At the same time, China has carefully observed and analyzed US military
operations, and begun to shape its own Revolution in Military Affairs,
intended, in large part, to counter US military superiority.
Beijing's military doctrine has undergone
numerous reforms. The PRC's first school of thought, the "People's War",
dates to Mao's era. This doctrine focuses on the enemy is a major power
such as the United States, Russia, or Japan, who will attempt to invade
and conquer China. Under the assumptions of the People's War, armed
conflict would last for many years, and the Chinese military and
leadership would fall back to the interior of the country, at which point,
Chinese forces would work to wear down the enemy through a protracted war.
24
The second school of thought, Local War,
originated in the 1980s and applies to battles against a non-superpower
opponent. These battles would consist of small-scale conflicts on or near
China's border, and would require rapid reaction forces. The targets would
be the local forces of countries such as Vietnam, India, Taiwan, or the
Philippines. 25 Local war encompasses many scenarios and
applies to anything smaller than a global scale, requiring more modern
technologies.
The third school of Chinese military
doctrine is that the Chinese military must undergo a Revolution in
Military Affairs, and prepare for a conflict with nations who have also
undergone such a revolution. "A Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA) is
commonly described as a fundamental change in the nature of warfare...not
solely dependent upon the exploitation of technology." 26 The Chinese
emphasis on an RMA has been heavily influenced by recent conflicts, such
as Desert Storm/Desert Shield and the Kosovo Conflict, in which a
combination of high technology weapons and modernized strategies ensured a
speedy victory.
An RMA conflict would pit China against a
highly advanced opponent such as the United States. Countering such an
opponent would require asymmetric warfare. The PLA must use new
technologies or use its forces in innovative ways in order to offset any
adversarial advantage. Lasers could be used to blind satellite sensors,
missiles could engage enemy forces further out, and viruses could cripple
command and control functions. All these tactics would be used to attempt
to level the playing field or give China the advantage. PLA forces would
degrade the adversary's ability to attack China's forces by targeting the
enemy's command and control infrastructure, using computer viruses,
anti-satellite technology, and directed energy weapons. 27 China's forces
would be networked together, and would seek to pre-empt enemy attacks,
prevent logistics build-up, and reduce the enemy to fighting without its
technological edge.
China has gone to great lengths to prepare
for fighting a war under the RMA school of thought. The production of
obsolete equipment has been curtailed, while funds have been invested in
the research and development of new weapons. Beijing has also purchased
advanced Western military equipment. In the summer of 2000, China's
attempts to purchase to the advanced Phalcon radar system from Israel fell
through when Israel, bowing to US pressure, cancelled the deal. However,
in November 2000, Russia entered into talks with China to sell its version
of AWACs to China. 28 Advanced systems such as the Phalcon
airborne radar system and AWACs are part of the ongoing Chinese efforts to
"enhance its overall command control and communciations and intelligence
capability." 29 China's military modernization also
includes a missile buildup. At their current rate of production, the PLA
will have over 500 hundred medium-range missiles fielded (mostly targeted
on Taiwan) by 2005.
China's approach the RMA includes a
substantial focus on space-based technologies. Enhancements of its space
capabilities are essential for fighting a war under the RMA, and also, for
modernizing and improving its domestic economy and infrastructure. In
order to develop a modern command and control infrastructure, Beijing has
been installing fiber optic phone networks, has acquired satellite
communications, and has been developing cellular phone infrastructure
across China. Such efforts have considerable civilian and commercial, as
well as military, utility. The modernization of China's domestic
telecommunications system is a prerequisite for the continued growth of
its economy, and can be done in a shorter time frame, and for a lower
price through the use of satellite-based telecommunications (rather than
conventional ground-based telecommunications infrastructure). China
considers space-based systems an essential component of its military,
however due to economic constraints generally pursues dual-use systems.
This is due to China's limited high technology sector, and the increasing
dependence on the economic benefits stemming from satellite technologies.
The necessity of making satellite systems dual-use in nature places
certain design constraints on these systems, and may limit China's ability
to exploit satellite information technologies for military purposes.
Despite the doctrinal reforms currently
underway, the PLA force structure is still largely reflective of the years
spent preparing for possible regional war against the United States, or
the Soviet Union, with an emphasis on the size of the force, rather than
technological advantage. Total personnel currently number well over two
and a half million (see table 1), but Beijing has recently announced a
reduction of over 500,000 troops. 30 The PLA's arsenal consists of mainly
1960s-era equipment. China's most recent purchases from Russia to upgrade
its military technology have included squadrons of Su-27 fighters, three
Kilo-class submarines, and two new destroyers. 31 Recent
purchases and indigenous technology development have gone far towards
improving the PLA's warfighting capability. However, the Chinese Army does
not yet seem to have modernized its training, or completed its
implementation of advanced technologies. As Beijing can only afford to
modernize parts of its immense military, only small elite sections have
received the most modern equipment and training.
Table 1: PLA Force Structure, 199832
|
ICBM |
20 |
Missiles |
IRBM |
80 |
Forces |
SLBM |
12 |
|
Bombers |
120 |
|
Personnel |
1,900,000 |
Army
| Tanks
| 14,000
|
|
Artillery |
14,500 |
|
Personnel |
260,000 |
Navy |
Destroyers and Frigates |
56 |
|
Submarines |
63 |
|
Personnel |
470,000 |
Air Force |
Fighters |
2,956 |
|
Bombers |
470 |
The Chinese army is not as formidable as
its force of nearly two million might suggest, for it has yet to complete
the modernization of its weapons or doctrine. China's nuclear capability
helps make it a world-class power despite its largely third-world economy.
This gives the PRC great regional strength and provides deterrence against
nuclear attacks. Nevertheless, China's strategic weapons remain limited in
capacity and fall short of targeting the entire United States.
CHINA'S SPACE TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS
China is one of only three nations with an
independent heavy spacelift capability. The PRC's space program, like
those of the United States and the USSR, is closely related to its
development of missile technology. China's military and civilian space
launch vehicle development began in the 1950s, concurrent with its
construction of long-range ballistic missiles. 32 China's early
efforts were significantly advanced by technology and knowledge
transferred from the Soviet Union. Since that time, China has developed a
broad-based space program that includes a family of rockets, numerous
satellites, and a telemetry, tracking, and control network. Tremendous
efforts, and multiple failures, are now paying off, as China is now a
significant space power. It offers international commercial launch
services and is currently working on human spaceflight.
LAUNCHER TECHNOLOGY AND COMMERCIAL LAUNCH SERVICES
The Cultural Revolution slowed the
development of China's space program in the 1960s, and the country did not
achieve its first successful satellite launch until April 24, 1970, using
a CSS-3 intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), which was modified for
space launch by adding a third stage. This new rocket, named the Long
March 1, carried a 380-pound satellite named Dong Fang Hong-1 (East Is Red
1). The satellite orbited for approximately 26 days, transmitting to Earth
the song "The East is Red." After China's second successful launch of a
satellite on March 3, 1971 using the Long March 1, China set out to
develop a more powerful rocket, the Long March 2.
China successfully launched the Long March
2C on July 26, 1975, placing its third satellite into orbit. During the
balance of the 1970s, China launched nearly a dozen satellites on the Long
March 2, many of which were undoubtedly for military purposes. However,
nearly half of these launches were unsuccessful, resulting in the loss of
several payloads. The Long March 2 and its derivatives are the primary
launch vehicles used by China today, in both its military and civilian
space programs. In order to meet space launch requirements for heavier
payloads and higher orbits, China has over the years markedly improved the
performance of the Long March rocket.
China recognizes the importance of outer
space, not only for its utility to the military, but also for its
commercial potential. China conducts nearly all of its own launches, using
the Long March family of rockets, developed specifically for launching
communications satellites into geosynchronous orbit. China is believed to
be developing a new, larger rocket that will be able to carry heavier
payloads into orbit. Such a rocket might depend on cryogenic liquid
propellant engines, possibly the RD-120, one of which was acquired from
Russia during the 1990s. 33 Difficulties with the development of the
new engines for this rocket may have prompted China to focus on modernized
versions of the Long March rocket that would utilize improved strap-on
boosters to achieve greater payload-to-orbit capability.
While the Long March 4 was intended to
launch geostationary communications satellites, flaws in its design have
limited it to launching meteorological satellites, for military and
civilian purposes, into sun-synchronous orbit. 34 China's
attempts to modernize its Long March rockets have met with limited
success, as the Long March 2E has suffered a series of in-flight failures.
The December 1992 and January 1995 failures resulted in the destruction of
two Hughes-manufactured satellites. Two years after the first successful
launch of the Long March 2E, China successfully launched the Long March
3A, a cheaper higher performance rocket that would better meet both its
military and commercial geosynchronous launch requirements. The Long March
3A was the first of a family of Long March 3A, 3B and 3C rockets.
China entered the commercial space launch
market in the mid-1980's, when the lack of available U.S. commercial space
launch capacity forced satellite manufacturers to seek alternative launch
providers. Although the Soviet Union had the capacity to launch commercial
satellites, U.S. policy at the time would not support the launch of
U.S.-manufactured satellites on Soviet rockets. The European consortium,
Arianespace, offered the Ariane 4 rocket, but had no extra capacity. This
left China as the most likely alternative for US commercial interests
seeking to launch geosynchronous communications satellites. The Reagan
Administration also saw the opportunity to counterbalance Soviet influence
in Asia. Thus, in 1988, President Reagan agreed to allow China to launch
US-manufactured satellites on the condition that China sign three
bilateral agreements on competitive pricing, liability, and the protection
of US technology. 35 Despite export control and technology
transfer provisions in early US-China agreement, there have been recurrent
accusations of illegal technology transfer from the United States to
China.
China's relative success in launching its
own satellites not only led it into the commercial satellite launch
market, but also shaped developments of China's launchers. To enhance the
marketability of its launch services, as well as to develop its own space
launch capabilities, China developed a rocket that could provide
heavy-lift capabilities to low earth orbit (LEO). China was slow to
successfully develop an indigenous Chinese kick motor to place heavy
payloads into geosynchronous orbit; thus, early customers had to depend on
Western-manufactured kick motors. This further complicated the export
control issues linked to Chinese launches of Western (particularly US)
satellites. China later developed its own family of kick motors.
China's first commercial launch of a
US-manufactured communications satellite occurred on April 7, 1990. The
Asiasat (a Hughes HS 376 model satellite) was launched into orbit aboard a
Long March 3 rocket. Since then, in addition to their military launch
schedule, China has attempted 28 launches of Western-manufactured
satellites. Of these satellites, 27 were US-manufactured. The only
successful launch by a non-U.S. manufacturer was the French-manufactured
Sinosat, launched successfully on July 18, 1998. Twenty-three of China's
attempts twenty-seven attempts to launch US satellites were successful.
China's involvement in the commercial launch market has been marred both
by the Long March's less-than-ideal reliability and by export control and
technology transfer issues with the United States.
LARGELY MILITARY SPACE SYSTEMS
China is believed to be developing space
and ground-based anti-satellite laser weapons. Such weapons would be of
considerable value for the control of space and space-based information
services. China also appears to have the technical capability to develop
direct ascent anti-satellite weapons, especially given the assistance of
Russian technicians and technology. Some experts believe that China "seems
to have the requisite quantity and quality of launch and nuclear resources
to produce an ASAT weapon in the near future." 36 With ASAT
capabilities, China "could dominate space activities against military and
commercial space satellites that might interfere with regional dispute on
their borders. The development and visible operation of ASATs may serve as
a source of national prestige to bolster the current government's position
internationally and domestically." 37
China has developed a space-based
anti-satellite weapon whose name translates as "parasitic satellite" or
alternatively "piggyback satellite." Sources within the Chinese government
have claimed that the Small Satellite Institute, part of the Chinese
Academy of Science, has completed ground testing of a nanosatellite
weapon. Supposedly this "parasitic satellite" can orbit close to an enemy
satellite and then "lock onto it." 38 The satellite remains passive until
needed and can disrupt or destroy the target satellite. The entire system
consists of three components: several microsatellites, a mother ship, and
the ground control system. China plans on carrying out on-orbit testing in
the coming year or two. While China has developed microsatellite
technology with the University of Surrey and has developed the ability to
deploy multiple satellites from its Long March rockets, it is not clear
that they have developed the technology to build satellites as small as
they claim nor the command and control capability to rendezvous a
parasitic satellite with a target.
China has its own photoreconnaissance and
meteorological satellites, and may also possess some electronic
intelligence satellites. China's photoreconnaissance satellite is called
the Fanhui Shi Weixing (FSW) or Recoverable Test Satellite. The first
version of the satellite was successfully launched on November 26, 1975,
using a Long March 2C rocket. The current version of the Recoverable Test
Satellite uses a recoverable capsule similar in concept to those used in
the early US Corona program. These satellites have a short lifespan of
several weeks. Their systems seem limited to optical, optical-electronic,
and infrared sensors. 39 While the resolution of these
satellites-on the order of 10 meters-is fairly low, it is sufficient for
tracking ships at sea and detecting large military units. This satellite
provides China with some limited ability to photograph US military
installations, and to monitor Taiwanese activities. It is somewhat
difficult to distinguish between FSW satellites flown for civilian, earth
resources missions and FSW satellites flown for reconnaissance missions.
Interestingly, it was through these
reconnaissance satellites that China achieved its first success in the
commercial market. In 1987 the French company Matra contracted with China
to place a scientific payload in orbit, using a Long March 2C rocket. The
French scientific experiments were launched on August 5, 1987 aboard a
converted FSW. The recoverable capsules of China's reconnaissance
satellites made them an ideal platform for certain micro-gravity
experiments.
The FSW-2 is China's current and enhanced
version of this satellite. The FSW-2 is larger than the FSW-1 and has a
longer on-orbit life. The FSW-2 military reconnaissance satellite has been
launched three times since 1992, the most recent one in October 1996.
China also announced that it is going to deploy a new, more capable
military reconnaissance satellite. The most recent Feng Yun satellite was
launched June 25, 2000. 40 In the near future (the first launch is
predicted sometime in 2001), China is expected to introduce its third
generation of imaging satellite, the FSW-3. This satellite "is expected to
be a recoverable system with a one meter resolution. China's Academy of
Space Technology (CAST) engineers have also conducted design work on a
tactical imagery system and associated mobile ground receiving stations.
The system is based on small satellite technology, uses a charged coupled
device (CCD) array, and, when operating in a 700-kilometer sun synchronous
orbit, is designed to have a five meter resolution." 41 When
operational, these systems will represent a significant advance over
current Chinese capabilities.
China has developed two different types of
meteorological satellites for military and civil purposes, known as Feng
Yun (Wind and Cloud). The FY-1 series of weather satellites, first
launched in 1988, are polar-orbiting. However, these satellites have
suffered a series of on-orbit failures. One of China's recent ventures in
remote sensing has been the China-Brazil Earth Resources Satellite
(CBERS). This satellite focuses on environmental Imagery, and carries
several sensors, including an infrared multi-spectral scanner. The first
satellite, launched in 1999, is currently on-orbit, and both a second
launch and imagery sale are planned. CBERS represents a technological
advance for China because these satellites employ charge coupled devices,
and transmit their imagery back to earth.
DUAL-USE AND CIVILIAN SPACE PROGRAMS
HUMAN SPACE FLIGHT
China has also, since the 1950s, conducted
research into placing astronauts into orbit, and appears close to
achieving that goal. Since the 1980s, China has begun to develop plans for
space shuttle-like spacecraft, recoverable capsules, and a space station.
China has signed inter-governmental agreements with Russia in 1992 and
1994 that established cooperative activities in human spaceflight. In
1996, two Chinese astronauts began training at the Gagarin Cosmonaut
Training Center in Star City, in Russia. "The Chinese have indicated that
a Sino-Russian cosmonaut exchange is possible once they have a piloted
spacecraft in orbit. Russian sources have said that it will be the
Russians who build a controllable spaceship in China and provide active
cooperation toward China's launching a 20-ton spacecraft into orbit." 42 In January
2001, China successfully orbited an unmanned version of their Shenzhou-2
capsule. Shenzhou-2 reportedly carried live animals, and represented an
important step towards human space flight. There are speculations that "if
Shenzhou-3 is as smooth a flight as Shenzhou-2 seems to have been, perhaps
they will fly their first two 'Taikonauts' [Chinese astronauts] in
Shenzhou-4 during 2002.'" 43 China is the only major space power not
engaged in the International Space Station (ISS), however, future
involvement is not out of the question. China's space-related activity
level, actual or projected, is kept just high enough to position China for
future consideration for inclusion on the ISS. Chinese leaders have
indicated interest in ISS participation but have stressed that the time is
not yet right, because of shortages in funds and still-limited
technological ability.
NAVIGATION
For years China has relied on the US
Global Positioning System (GPS) and the Russian Global Navigation
Satellite System (GLONASS) navigation satellites. China has begun to
reduce this dependence with the recent launch of own navigation satellite
system, known as Twin Star or Beidou. It recently launched a two-satellite
regional positioning satellite system called Beidou ("Northern Dipper").
These two geostationary satellites, launched in October and December 2001,
are less capable than GPS or GLONASS, but give China its first autonomous
satellite navigation capability. 44,45 Chinese officials have stated that China
is working on a more complex, global navigation system using a larger
number of satellites in various orbital planes. 46,47 The Twin
Star/Beidou positioning system program uses two satellites in
geosynchronous orbit for positioning, messaging, and timing services over
China and nearby regions. The Twin Star system represents China's attempt
to decrease its dependence on the United States' GPS and the Russian
GLONASS navigation satellites. China has reportedly also recently
approached Russia with an offer to buy or fund, the GLONASS system for
approximately $1 Billion. 48 A fully operational GLONASS system
requires 21 satellites with three on-orbit spares, but the financial
crisis in Russia has reduced the number of operational satellites
currently on orbit, thereby degrading the system's capability.
COMMUNICATIONS SATELLITES
China's vast geographic expanse and
mountainous terrain makes it difficult to field a conventional 20th
century ground-based telephone system. Not only is it less expensive to
develop a telecommunications system with space-based infrastructure than
to lay ground lines, but doing so allows the development of militarily
applicable technologies and expertise. The desire to improve domestic
communications infrastructure, and overcome the challenges posed by
China's terrain, led to the desire to place geostationary communications
satellites into orbit.
China's first communications satellites
program began in the early 1970s, and was based on Western technology. All
of these satellites were designed for military purposes at the China
Academy of Space Technology (CAST), but have been dual-use in nature.
Until 1984, China relied mainly on Intersputnik and Intelsat satellites
for its civil domestic and international communications. Today, three
public satellite operators in China provide telecommunications: ChinaSat,
Sino Satellite Communications, and China Orient Telecommunications
Satellite (ChinaStar).
Since the beginning of its domestic
communications satellite programs, China has suffered a string of problems
with the performance of its communications satellites, as well as with the
rockets designed to place those satellites into orbit. China's
difficulties in building and placing reliable communications satellites
into orbit has created serious gaps in its satellite communications
capabilities, both for civilian and military purposes. China has addressed
the greatest part of its satellite communications requirement by leasing
communication channels on Western-manufactured communications satellites.
Today, approximately 80% of China's communications satellites are derived
from foreign sources. 49
China's second-generation communications
satellites were the Dong Fang Hong-2 ("The East is Red") series. On April
8, 1984, the second launch attempt successfully placed a communications
satellite into orbit. A third DFH-2 satellite was successfully launched in
February 1986, capable of covering the entire country and used for
transmitting TV programs to remote areas. In 1988, China launched an
improved version of this satellite, known as the DFH-2A. These satellites
were able to handle five television channels and 3,000 phone calls
simultaneously. The first three of these satellites were later renamed
"Chinasats" by China, and were successfully launched twice in 1988 and
once in 1990. The DFH-2As were the first Chinese satellites equipped with
full communications functionality.
The third generation of Chinese
communications satellites (DFH-3) represents China's most modern
communication satellites. The DFH-3 satellite is designed to have an
8-year on-orbit life. China's second attempt to launch a DFH-3 satellite,
on May 11, 1997, successfully placed the satellite into a geosynchronous
orbit. China has reportedly suffered problems with the satellite. China is
reportedly developing a satellite direct broadcasting system, the DFH-4.
This satellite, under development since the mid-1990s, would be able to
which can transmit data to users without the need for ground station
re-broadcasting. 50 Such a satellite would have both civilian
and military uses, for it could broadcast television programs directly to
users, and also "offer a capability for distributing information to the
lowest echelon in a battlefield if this technology were adapted to
military applications." 51
China is beginning to enhance its military
communications systems, introducing data relay satellites which "will
allow China's space sensing platforms to pass data to a ground station
without being within line of sight of a ground station." 52 One
militarily-important new satellite, the Feng Huo-1, launched in January
2000, is part of "the Qu Dian C4I system, China's first integrated
command, control, communications, computer and intelligence system (C4I).
The new Qu Dian system, gives the Chinese military new capabilities for
coordinating and supporting its growing terrestrial forces..."53 While ensured
military access to satellite communications is essential for China, the
nation is likely to prefer dual-use satellites to dedicated military
satellites.
As China had limited communications
satellite construction capabilities, it has sought more reliable and
technologically advanced Western components. Several US companies marketed
their communications satellite technologies to China. In 1995, a
Memorandum of Agreement between Loral and China Aerospace Corporation
offered China direct broadcast satellites, regional mobile satellite
services systems, and the joint development of an advanced high capacity
communications satellite. Under this agreement, Loral would provide design
and technical support, while the final integration of the satellite was to
occur in Germany or China. Hughes and Loral competed for the Asia-Pacific
Mobile Telecommunications (APMT) satellite. APMT is a Singapore-based,
Chinese controlled company. At least 51% of APMT is owned by Chinese
Government agencies. Because of its relatively limited technology and
satellite failures, China has retained a certain dependence on
Western-manufactured communications satellites.
China has acquired very small aperture
communications terminals (VSATs) that can be used for military as well as
civilian satellite communications. VSATs are used to transmit voice, data,
video, fax, and computer-to-computer communications between multiple
users. Their small size allows easy transportation between different
locations and assembly in remote areas. VSAT networks could improve
China's military command and control capabilities, by allowing mobile,
reliable communications virtually anywhere.
History of China's Domestic Communications
Satellite Launches:
Chinese Satellite |
Date |
Chinese Rocket |
Result |
DFH-2 |
Jan. 29, 1984 |
Long March 3 |
Rocket Failure |
DFH-2 |
Apr. 8, 1984 |
Long March 3 |
Success |
DFH-2 |
Feb. 1, 1986 |
Long March 3 |
Success |
DFH-2A |
Mar. 7, 1988 |
Long March 3 |
Success |
DFH-2A |
Dec. 22, 1988 |
Long March 3 |
Success |
DFH-2A |
Feb. 4, 1990 |
Long March 3 |
Success |
DFH-2A |
Dec. 28, 1991 |
Long March 3 |
Rocket Failure |
DFH-3 |
Nov. 29, 1994 |
Long March 3A |
Satellite Failure |
DFH-3 |
May 11, 1997 |
Long March 3A |
Satellite Problem |
IMPLICATIONS OF CHINESE SPACE ACTIVITIES
China's growing familiarity with, and use
of, space-based technologies have numerous applications and benefits. Such
technologies will allow China to enhance domestic services and
infrastructure, provide enhanced military capabilities to its armed
forces, and gain greater prestige and influence in the Pacific Rim. The
PRC's development of, or access to space technologies will strengthen it
militarily, adding to China's ability to implement its Revolution in
Military Affairs. This will enhance the PLA's ability to project military
power and perform precision strike operations, and, thus, will strengthen
China's regional hegemony.
The enhancement of China's space-based
technologies and its ability to apply these technologies is likely to
allow China to demonstrate its leadership and power, and position itself
as a technologically advanced nation. China's development of human
spaceflight would illustrate an impressive technological ability and
contribute to a significant enhancement of its prestige. "China's ambition
to place crews into space is spurred by a desire to be taken seriously as
a major space power." 54 China's expansion of satellite
communications ability enhances the services it provides its citizens, and
allows it to improve command and control of its military forces. Increased
satellite communications capabilities could also allow China to market
telephony and data services to neighboring countries, thus maximizing the
economic benefits of space technologies.
In the modern battlefield, space
technologies, either solely military or dual-use, are essential to
victory. Beijing's careful analysis of the Gulf War and the Kosovo
conflict, have brought an awareness of how space-based technologies can
enable precision attacks, command and control, and enhance battlefield
intelligence. In order to minimize its economic burden and sidestep its
technological limitations, China has incorporated dual-use technology,
acquired on the open market, into its spacelift, meteorological, and
communications programs. One example of the PRC's use of dual-use systems
is China's incorporation of Global Positioning technology into its
military structure and technology: troops, aircraft, and missiles now
employ this US technology. China's remote-sensing and satellite
communication systems depend heavily upon dual-use, commercially developed
and/or available technologies. For example, cooperation with Brazil on the
China-Brazil Earth Resources Satellite (CBERS) program has allowed the two
countries to pool their resources and develop more advanced multi-spectral
imaging. 55
China's RMA and its economic development
goals necessitate access to advanced technologies. To achieve the RMA, and
to field the futuristic forces this doctrine envisions, Beijing must
acquire lasers, anti-satellite weapons, and better missile guidance
systems. China is painfully aware of the limitations of its current
technology and is willing to buy the technology it cannot master. While
China cannot purchase all of the technologies it seeks, it has been able
to purchase significant amounts of technology (or key components) and has
been able to gain additional technology through different modes of
technology transfer. Dual-use technologies are well suited to China's
current level of development. Such technologies can be purchased openly
until domestic capabilities are improved. As well, Chinese domestic
pursuit of dual-use technologies will allow the enhancement of the
military, without removing scarce resources from essential civil economic
and infrastructure development.
China's technical deficits have led to a
dependence on several forms of technology transfer. China, at once, wants
independent, and maximally technically advanced capabilities. As it still
lags in certain advanced militarily relevant technologies, China has
developed other mechanisms for meeting its needs. China's technology
transfer efforts represent an effort to maximize access to top-of-the-line
technologies while minimizing dependency on any one foreign nation.
The first mode of technology transfer is
the explicit purchase military hardware. China has purchased planes,
munitions, and weapons components from Russia, Israel, European nations,
as well as from several US defense contractors. The second mode of
technology transfer has been the transfer of advanced civilian
technologies from Europe, Israel, Russia, and so on (US transfers of this
sort are grouped under the third category). China has begun to buy, or
develop with significant foreign assistance, satellites,
telecommunications equipment, and computer technology. A significant
amount of technology has been transferred from Russia to China. In 1995
"China purchased upper-stage rocket engines" [from Russia]..."There are
also unconfirmed reports from 1995 that Russia allowed China to recruit an
entire cruise missile research and development team." 56 The legal
transfer of technologies (civilian and military) significantly improves
(1) China's current infrastructure and technological capabilities; (2)
China's knowledge and ability to carry out similar future projects
independently; and (3) China's ability to transfer aspects of civilian
technologies to military uses.
A certain amount of advanced civilian and
dual-use technology has been transferred from the United States to China.
Some of this technology transfer occurred following the launch failures of
several US made satellites on Chinese rockets. Specifically, the launch
failures involve a 1995 Hughes satellite and a 1996 Loral satellite.
Through consultations following the launch failures, "it is likely that
the Chinese gained militarily applicable technical information and
know-how." 57
The information transferred to China may have "improved the reliability of
PRC rockets useful for civilian and military purposes. The illegally
transmitted information is useful for the design and improved reliability
of future PRC ballistic missiles, as well." 58 An example of this type of technology
transfer is the PRC's alleged theft of "classified U.S. information about
the neutron bomb from a US national weapons laboratory."59 While it is
difficult to estimate exactly how much militarily relevant information
China has actually obtained from US sources, it is likely that a certain
amount of technology transfer has occurred, and has potentially bolstered
China's military and space-based technologies.
Return to Table of Contents.