In his 1945 paper "Extraterrestrial
Communications" Arthur C. Clarke described a revolutionary idea for a
worldwide communications system, in which three satellites would be
positioned over the equator and linked by radio to the ground. Such a
system would allow anyone on earth to contact anyone else on earth. This
idea rapidly went from science fiction to science fact. Three years later
Bell Labs announced the invention of the transistor, twelve years later
the Soviet Union demonstrated the capability to put a satellite in orbit,
and the world has never been the same. Satellite communications represent
a technique of sharing information that minimizes or eliminates boundaries
and borders. The widespread use of communications satellites has also
given rise to numerous policy issues, which increasingly require
multi-national dialogues if appropriate solutions are to be achieved.
SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS IN THE PACIFIC RIM
The Pacific Rim is, increasingly, an area
of great interest for US military leaders, policy makers, politicians, and
business interests. This chapter examines the satellite communication
services available in China, Taiwan, Japan, and the Koreas, now and in the
near future. It also explores the connection between the growth and
proliferation of satellite communications, and the increasingly numerous
and complex policy dilemmas precipitated by this new technology.
PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA
DOMESTIC SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS
China's satellite program began in 1970
with the launch of DFH-1, a small satellite that broadcast the tune "Dong
Fang Hong" (The East is Red). From 1972-84 China relied essentially on
Intelsat (via China's Ministry of Post and Telecommunications - MPT) and
Intersputnik satellites for its domestic and international communications.
Television broadcast was the primary service, with some voice traffic for
domestic communications. Voice and low-speed data communications were the
main services for international communications. Today, there are three
public satellite operators in China: ChinaSat, China Orient
Telecommunications Satellite, and Sino Satellite Communications.
CHINASAT
In 1983 China Telecommunications Broadcast
Satellite (ChinaSat), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MPT, was formed to
provide a satellite-based TV broadcast network to China's remote areas. In
1986, China successfully launched DFH-2, capable of covering the entire
country. DFH-2 was used for transmitting TV programs to remote areas. In
1988, China launched three more DFH communications satellites, named
DFH-2A-1, 2A-2, 2A-3 (later renamed ChinaSat-1, ChinaSat-2 and
ChinaSat-3). The DFH-2As were the first Chinese satellites equipped with
full communications functionality. All DFH-2As ceased to function by
1994.
Prior to 1993, ChinaSat was essentially an
advisory group without operational responsibility. It did not own any
space elements, as all space programs were strictly classified and all DFH
satellites were operated by the military. The situation began to change in
1993, when China acquired ChinaSat-5, GTE's Spacenet 1 satellite. Since
the military was not allowed to engage in commercial activity, MPT made
the purchase. Thus, ChinaSat-5 became China's first civilian satellite,
and ChinaSat became China's first commercial satellite operator.
In 1994 China signed an agreement with
Daimler-Benz (now DaimlerChrysler) Aerospace to build ChinaSat-6 for
domestic satellite services. In the meantime, ChinaSat-7's 1996 launch was
unsuccessful. China launched ChinaSat-6 in 1997. However, because of
altitude stabilization problems leading to excessive fuel consumption, the
satellite's life expectancy is expected to be short. In 1997 China signed
a $100 million contract to build ChinaSat-8, however the satellite has not
been exported to China because of US export regulations implemented in
1999. In January 2001, the State Department once again declined to either
reject or approve the export license for Loral's ChinaSat-8.1
Thus, as of May 2001, the final status of ChinaSat-8 was still
undetermined.
CHINA ORIENT TELECOMMUNICATIONS SATELLITE
China Orient was formed in April 1995. Its
main investors include MPT and the State Planning Commission, a national
budgetary agency. Officially, China Orient is loosely attached to MPT for
its business activities and is subject to MPT supervision; in actuality,
China Orient has attained a high degree of autonomy in satellite
procurement, service provisioning, network management and investment. This
is another indication of separation of administration from business
operations, and the changing identity of government agencies to business
enterprises.
In late 1995, China Orient contracted with
Lockheed Martin for a high-power, high-capacity communications satellite
called ChinaStar-1. The satellite is built on Lockheed Martin's A2100
platform with 24 C-band and 24 Ku-band transponders units. ChinaStar-1 has
an effective coverage of China and Southeast Asian countries in both C-
and Ku-band, and part of South Asia and the Middle East (C-band only).
ChinaStar-1 was launched successfully May 3, 1998. China Orient has plans
to purchase two more satellites, ChinaStar-2 and ChinaStar-3, but it has
not disclosed any dates and technical information.
SINOSAT
Sino Satellite Communications is a non-MPT
satellite consortium. Formed in 1994, Sino Satellite includes China
Aerospace Corp (CASC), Commission of Defense Science & Technology,
People's Bank of China and the Government of Shanghai.
SinoSat-1, with 24 C-band and 14 Ku-band
transponders, was successfully launched in July 1998. The satellite is
built on Aerospatiale's Spacebus 3000 platform with Daimler-Benz Aerospace
as a subcontractor. The satellite provides television, telephone, and
database transmissions covering all of China, the Indo-Chinese peninsula,
Indonesia and the Philippines.
In December 1995, China and Singapore
created a consortium called Asia Pacific Mobile Telecommunications
Satellite (APMT). In May of 1998 APMT finalized a contract with Hughes
Space and Communications for an HS-601 called APMT-1. The approach of APMT
was to provide mobile satellite telephony service via a geostationary
system. In April of 1999 APMT terminated its contract with Hughes because
the satellite company was unable to secure the necessary export license
from the U.S. government.
If the People's Republic of China has
satellite communication systems dedicated to military or national security
needs in addition to those outlined here, they are either classified, or
public information about them is exceedingly scarce.
CHINESE COMSATS FROM HONG KONG
ASIASAT- In 1990 the Hong
Kong based consortium Asia Satellite Telecommunications Company (AsiaSat)
launched AsiaSat-1. This consortium includes China's International Trust
and Investment Corporation, Hutchison Whampoa of Hong Kong, and Cable and
Wireless of Britain. AsiaSat-2 was launched in November of 1995. A failed
launch in December of 1997 resulted in the loss of AsiaSat-3. In December
of 1998 Societé Européene des Satellites (SES) purchased a 34.13%
stake in AsiaSat with the intention of enhancing AsiaSat's broadcasting
and telecom business. On March 21, 1999 AsiaSat successfully launched
AsiaSat-3S, a replacement satellite for AsiaSat-3. AsiaSat 3S, a Hughes
HS601HP model, carries 28 C-band and 16 Ku-band linearised transponders
and has a planned 15-year operational life. With a single C-band
footprint, AsiaSat 3S covers over 50 countries in Asia, the Middle East,
and Australia. The last satellite in this constellation will be AsiaSat-4,
a replacement for AsiaSat-1, scheduled for launch in the first half of
2002.
APTSTAR -The Hong Kong-based
Asia Pacific Telecommunications Satellite Company (APT) is a consortium of
four regional companies, three of which are Chinese state-owned entities
(including ChinaSat). Formed in 1992, APTStar launched its first
satellite, APTStar-1, in 1994. The satellite provides coverage to China,
Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore, Indonesia, and Vietnam with 24 C-band
transponders. A launch failure in 1995 destroyed APTStar-2, a Hughes built
satellite, but China successfully launched APTStar-2R in 1997. APTStar-2R,
built by Space Systems/Loral, has 27 C-band and 16 Ku-band transponders,
all of which are being leased by Loral Skynet.
PACIFIC CENTURY MATRIX-
DaimlerChrysler Aerospace and Pacific Center Group of Hong Kong have
created a joint venture called Pacific Century Matrix Ltd. PC Matrix is
intended to provide space and terrestrial based broadband access in the
Asia-Pacific region, and eventually to other parts of the world. Service
will initially be provided via leased transponder space on AsiaSat-3S
until a dedicated Ka/X-band satellite is available, presumably near the
end of 2002. The funding and technical details of PC Matrix are still in
development.
TAIWAN
ROCSAT- In the early 1990s
Taiwan adopted a long-range plan to acquire technical and functional
capabilities related to developing and operating satellites and other
space technologies. Subsequently, the National Space Program Office was
established, and a multidisciplinary satellite program was initiated.
Development of the first satellite in this program, Rocsat-1, was begun in
1992. TRW built the satellite bus for the spacecraft and the
communications payload was built and integrated by Taiwan's
Microelectronics Technology. Rocsat 1, launched in 1999, was built by TRW
and carries a Ka-band communications relay experiment.
JAPAN
NATIONAL SPACE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (NASDA) SPONSORED COMSATS AND
RESEARCH
ETS- Japan's first satellite
systems were the Engineering Test Satellite (ETS) series, which began in
1975 with ETS-1. Two years later NASDA launched its first GEO platform
ETS-2, and in 1987 Japan launched ETS-5, the first spacecraft with a
specific communications objective. ETS-6, which carried a wide assortment
of communications systems and experiments utilizing Ka-band, S-band and
O-band links, was lost in August 1994. ETS-7, launched in 1997, is still
operational. NASDA's ETS-8, scheduled for launch in 2003, will conduct
orbital experiments to test the use of mobile satellite communications
with hand-held terminals- a system similar to Global Star.
DRTS- The Date Relay Test
Satellite (DRTS), planned for launch in 2002, will conduct orbital
experiments for advanced data relay technology. DRTS consists of two
satellites, the DRTS-W (West) and the DRTS-E (East). Direct communication
with low earth orbit satellites requires a number of ground stations. The
two DRTS satellites make it possible for a ground station to communicate
with spacecraft without the help of other ground stations.
GMMSS- Global Multimedia
Mobile Satellite System is a system designed to test next generation LEO
mobile communication services including mobile phone, Internet,
high-fidelity music, imagery, traffic information and movies. Some
research efforts are required before the system can be engineering and
launched, so operation is tentatively scheduled for 2005.
GIGABIT SATCOM- This is a
GEO satellite designed to test the transmission of data in the Ka-band at
1.2Gbps. The system could be ready for launch as early as 2005.
STATE OWNED JAPANESE COMMERCIAL SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS
PROVIDERS
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE
MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS- Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Mobile
Communications (NTT DoCoMo) is one of Japan's leading wireless
telecommunications service providers with more than 25 million
subscribers. NTT DoCoMo provides Satellite mobile communications service
covering all of Japan including the country's isolated islands by four
beams from the geostationary N-STAR satellite.
NTT DoCoMo has awarded a contract to a
Lockheed Martin-led team to build a geosynchronous satellite, N-STARc to
serve the mobile communications market in Japan. The contract was signed
January 6 2000 in Tokyo. N-STARc will operate in the S-band frequency band
with a C-band feeder link. It will be located at either 132° or
136° E and is planned for launch early in 2002. N-STARc will be
optimized for a 10-year life on-orbit, and will augment services provided
by the company's existing satellites.
PRIVATELY OWNED JAPANESE COMMERCIAL SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS
PROVIDERS
SPACE COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION OF
JAPAN- The Space Communications Corporation of Japan (SCC) was
formed in 1985 and launched its first satellite in 1989. SCC's Superbird A
was launched by Ariane in June 1989, and a second satellite, Superbird B,
was lost in 1990. Before a replacement could be launched, Superbird A
malfunctioned, necessitating its transfer to a graveyard orbit in 1991.
Superbird C, based on the Hughes HS-601 platform, was successfully
launched in 1997 with a total of 24 C-band and Ku-band transponders.
The newest SCC satellite, Superbird-4, was
launched in February of 2000. Built by Hughes Space and Communications,
Superbird 4 has 23 transponders in Ku-band and a navigable Ku-band spot
beam to increase service where needed. The satellite will also carry
high-speed data services with six Ka-band transponders. Its life
expectancy is about 13 years, although it has enough propellant to allow
correction maneuvers for 15 years.
JAPANESE SATELLITE SYSTEMS-
In 1985 the Japanese Satellite Systems Company (JSAT) was created to
provide a full range of telecommunications services. In March 1989, and
January 1990, JCSAT 1 and JCSAT 2 were launched by Ariane and Titan 3
boosters, respectively. Both satellites are identical, and are based on
the Hughes HS-393 platform. JCSAT 3 was launched in 1995 with 12 C-band
and 28 Ku-band transponders. JCSAT-4 was launched early in 1997, followed
later that year by JCSAT-5, which carried 32 active Ku-band
transponders.
In February of 1999 JSCAT-6 successfully
reached orbit after lift-off on an Atlas launch vehicle. The satellite is
being used to relay television and news reports throughout Japan, the
Asia-Pacific Rim and Hawaii. The spacecraft also carries high-speed data
transmissions. It is expected to last 12-years.
SOUTH KOREA
KOREASAT- South Korea's
first two spacecraft were carried as piggyback passengers on Ariane
flights to LEO in the early 1990s. In August of 1995 a malfunctioning
Delta-2 rocket left KoreaSat-1 in too low an orbit. Recovering from the
problem in space cost the Koreasat 1 satellite more than half of its
10-year supply of fuel. The following year KoreaSat-2 was placed in orbit.
Both satellites are Lockheed-Martin Series 3000 satellites providing
direct-to-home broadcasting service, multi-speed data transfer, and Very
Small Aperture Terminal services to South Korean businesses and the
government.
In 1999 KoreaSat-3 was successfully placed
on orbit at 116° E. The Koreasat-3 satellite is configured to provide
both fixed and direct broadcast services, with 24 Ku-Band (Fixed Satellite
Service), six Ku-Band (Direct Broadcast Service), and three Ka-Band
transponders. It also features a steerable antenna providing a regional
coverage capability. Korea Telecom of Seoul is responsible for operating
the KoreaSat constellation.
NORTH KOREA
In August 1998 North Korea launched a
medium range, three-stage Taepo Dong-1 ballistic missile. On September
4th, the Korean Central News Agency claimed that the Taepo Dong missile
had successfully launched North Korea's first satellite, the
Kwangmyongsong-1. The US has not been able to detect any radio
transmissions at the 27 MHz, the frequency at which North Korea claims the
satellite is transmitting its message of patriotic songs and Morse
signals. Experts believe a late-stage failure in the Taepo-Dong prevented
any satellite from being injected into orbit.
OTHER PACIFIC-RIM NATIONS
THAILAND
Thailand inaugurated its first national
GEO communications network during 1993-1994 with the launches of Thaicom-1
and Thaicom-2 on Ariane boosters. The spacecraft, based on Hughes HS-376L
series, are operated by the Shinawatra Satellite Company of Bangkok under
a lease arrangement with the Thai government. Both Thaicom satellites are
stationed at 78.5° E with ten C-band and two Ku-band transponders.
These 630-kg spacecraft have a design life of at least 13 years.
Thaicom-3, launched in 1997, will provide
communications services and direct to home television programming during
its expected lifetime of 14 years. The satellite will function in four
different coverage modes from its orbital position of 78.5° E. Using
its 25 C-band transponders, the satellite can serve its global coverage
zone for Asia, Australia, Europe, and Africa; and in the regional coverage
zone for nations including India and Thailand. The 14 Ku-band transponders
onboard will be used mostly for domestic coverage in Thailand.
INDONESIA
Since 1976 Indonesia has operated a
national GEO telecommunications network based on US-made Hughes
spacecraft. Called Palapa, the first series was Palapa-A followed by
Palapa-B launched in 1983. In early 1993, Indonesia established PT Satelit
Palapa Indonesia (Satelindo) of Jakarta, a commercial firm with the PT
Bimagraha Telekomindo the majority shareholder. This firm was established
to manage the Palapa C program and to secure additional investment
funding. PSN is also assisting in the Palapa C program with communications
services expertise. The Palapa-C satellites (C1, C2) carry 30 C-band and 4
Ku-band transponders and are at 113° E and 150.5° E.
Indonesia's second satellite system was
launched in 1997. Orbital Sciences Corporation built Indostar-1 satellite
for PT MediaCitra Indostar, which provided the first direct-to-home (DTH)
satellite television broadcast services to Indonesia.
In 1999, Indonesia launched another
communications satellite, Telecom-1, for PT Telkomunikasi (Telkom). The
satellite, which was built by Lockheed Martin Commercial Space Systems, is
placed at 108° E, and is configured with 24 C-Band and 12 extended
C-Band transponders. An on-orbit mechanical problem with the satellite's
solar array, and may limit its operational life. PSN is a partner in the
ACeS system (see below.)
MALAYSIA
A long-time user of INTELSAT and
Indonesian communications satellites, Malaysia decided in 1991 to
establish a domestic GEO communications system using US-built spacecraft.
Two Hughes HS-376 Malaysia East Asia Satellites (MEASATs) were launched in
1996. The MEASAT communications payload consists of 12 C-band and four,
high power (110 W) Ku-band active transponders. The design lifetime is 12
years.
PHILIPPINES
The Agila-2 satellite of Mabuhay
Philippines Satellite Corp. was launched in August of 1997. The spacecraft
is in GEO 144° E, permitting its 30 onboard C-band transponders to
cover a wide area ranging from the Philippines to India, China, and Japan.
Ku-band services through 24 onboard transponders service the Philippines,
Taiwan, northern Vietnam, and eastern China. Spot beam coverage is
possible to the Hawaiian islands.
ASIA CELLULAR SATELLITE INTERNATIONAL
Asia Cellular Satellite International
(ACeS) is a consortium of four US and Asian companies: Lockheed Martin
(32.5%) Pasifik Satelit Nusantara (PSN) of Indonesia (34.7%),
Philippine Long Distance Telephone (20.8%) and Jasmine International
of Thailand (11.9%). The Garuda 1 Global Mobile Personal
Communications Systems satellite, AceS' first satellite, was successfully
launched on February 28, 2000. A second satellite, Garuda 2, is being
built at the Lockheed Martin Commercial Satellite Center in Sunnyvale,
California. It will serve as a backup to Garuda 1 and will allow the ACeS
system to expand coverage to western and central Asia, the Middle East,
Europe and northern Africa. Garuda 1 is the world's first regional
satellite-based mobile telecommunications system specifically designed for
the Asian market. Garuda 1 is one of the most powerful telecommunications
satellites ever launched into space. A typical mobile phone handset can
communicate with this satellite from the ground, and Garuda 1 can support
up to 11,000 simultaneous telephone channels and up to 2 million
subscribers.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
The nations of the Pacific Rim all rely on
some level of foreign expertise in building their satellites, yet they are
all making strides to reduce this dependence, and they all enjoy a fairly
equal level of competency in managing and using their satellites. Japan is
the most technically capable of the Pacific-Rim nations, while North Korea
is the least technically advanced. Furthermore, the Pacific Rim nations
have, until recent years, relied exclusively on western launch technology
to place their satellites in orbit.
Prior to 1997, Southeast Asia was the
fastest growing telecommunications market in the world, and demand for
satellite services was high and growing. With the economic crisis of
summer 1997 growth and investment in the Asian satellite market came to a
standstill. However, by the end of 1999, the Asian markets were beginning
to revitalize. Even though satellite capacity exceeds demand in Asia
today, this imbalance is anticipated to end soon as economies continue
their recovery. Not only is it fair to assume that within the next 5-10
years nations of the Pacific Rim could be equipped with the services of
Western firms like GlobalStar, Teledesic, Skybridge, and the like, it is
easy to see how industrial partnerships similar to PC Matrix may be formed
to provide an Asian-based regional alternative to these systems.
US ALLIES:
A review of this technology is most
relevant in the context of increased tensions or armed conflict between
nations in the region. In this context, the first consideration is that US
allies in the Pacific have no dedicated military satellite communications
capability and thus, must rely on civil or commercial systems. As a
result, in a time of conflict they would be forced to rely even more
heavily on commercial systems, and integrate these into their regular
military operations. How well prepared they are to do this is not entirely
clear.
Like commercial systems elsewhere in the
world, satellite communication services in Asia are extremely vulnerable
in the sense that they are not protected against either severe
environmental conditions, or deliberate interference and jamming.
Furthermore, not all ground stations for these satellite systems are well
guarded against attack. With the advent of global MSS services, no nation
will be left without satellite communication in time of conflict. Even if
all indigenous ground stations and other means of securing FSS services
are eliminated, countries could theoretically use satellite phones and
satellite internet services to maintain functioning communications.
However, such a calculation also assumes that these nations would have
sufficient resources to purchase additional hardware and service from
providers. Furthermore, it is difficult to predict the behavior of
commercial firms who find themselves involved in a conflict.
"NATIONS OF CONCERN"
During a regional conflict initiated by
China or North Korea, satellite communications (and other advanced
technologies) could rapidly become a target and be rendered unavailable.
It would be possible for either nation to neutralize or eliminate
altogether the services their adversaries have. This would probably imply
launching missiles to destroy ground stations. For North Korea,
interfering with their adversaries' satellite communications facilities
would lessen North Korea's technological disadvantage, and move North
Korea closer to even ground with them. The North Korean military's minimal
reliance on satellite communications means that any damage to regional
satellite communications would have little or no direct adverse effect on
North Korea. Before acting to destroy or interfere with their adversaries'
indigenous capabilities, China and North Korea would need to consider
whether these nations had other means of buying or leasing such
capabilities. For China, the issue is even more complex. If China were to
eliminate or neutralize any indigenous satellite system a regional foe may
have, some of the commercial services that foe might turn to include
AsiaSat and ChinaStar, both Chinese-owned companies. While these companies
are technically private, the government and military has invested in them,
and maintains substantial potential influence. Would the PLA, in a time of
conflict, exert control over the use of all commercial satellite
communication services based in China or Hong Kong? Doing so might help
Chinese political/military aims, but would destroy the slim separation
that now exists between business operations and government agencies in
China. The use of commercial satellite communications instead of military
systems, or the denial of commercial satellite communications, in a
conflict present complex issues that few nations are prepared to deal with
in the abstract.
CONCLUSIONS
It is clear that the increasing
availability of commercial satellite communication services in the Pacific
introduce numerous policy concerns for the United States. One of the
general trends of today's space applications sectors is that technology
development is increasingly driven by business interests. Thus, instead of
shaping new technology, those in the governmental or policy arenas
(particularly those concerned with national security) now frequently are
left playing catch-up as they try to grapple with and regulate rapidly
advancing technologies. The international nature of the commercial
satellite communications sector means that the United States is forced to
deal with the growing influence, and somewhat unpredictable nature of,
organizations like the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and the
World Trade Organization (WTO). The United States has sometimes had
difficulty dealing with such multilateral forums in the recent past, and
prefers to work on a bilateral basis whenever possible. However,
increasing US dependence on, and interests in, satellite communications in
a global marketplace make its effective participation in the ITU and other
governing bodies a necessity. US preparedness to deal with emerging issues
related to satellite communications, including with dual use technology,
national security, international commerce, and regional tensions such as
those in the Pacific Rim, will depend on how the President, Congress, and
policy makers adjust to today's rapidly changing conditions.
[1] "US Keeps Hold on Loral ChinaSat-8 China Launch."
[2] A transponder is an instrument used on communications satellites that
receives a signal from a station on Earth at one frequency, amplifies it,
and shifts it to a new frequency.
APPENDIX 1
SUMMARY OF SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS IN PACIFIC RIM
The following tables are intended to provide a quick summary of Satcom
services available to those nations in the Pacific rim with more than
three satellites providing service. For future systems, proposals like
Teledesic, AstroLink, and ECCO are not included. That is not meant to
imply that services from these systems would not be provided to region,
but rather that because these systems are under development they are not
guaranteed to be available. Those Nations not listed here, specifically
Taiwan, will have access to the services provided by GlobalStar, ICO,
OrbComm, and ACeS.
APPENDIX 2
SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS BASICS
Every communications satellite in its simplest form involves the
transmission of information from an originating ground station to the
satellite (the uplink), followed by a retransmission of the information
from the satellite back to the ground (the downlink). The downlink may
either be to a select number of ground stations or it may broadcast to
everyone in a large area. Hence, each communications satellite must have a
receiver and a receiver antenna, a transmitter and a transmitter antenna,
some method for connecting the uplink to the downlink for retransmission,
and a source of electrical power for the electronics. Communication
satellites are designed to receive and relay on another frequency any
signal sent to them. Signals can be relayed earth-to-satellite,
satellite-to-satellite, or satellite-to-earth along any of the various
frequency bands by satellites in any earth orbit.
1. SPECTRUM
Global competition for limited frequency
spectrum is growing, and nations who wish to leverage commercial satellite
capabilities encounter many planning complexities and limitations. The
International Telecommunications Union (ITU) is responsible for promoting
cooperation between nations to ensure the effective use of the radio
frequency spectrum, which has been divided into separate frequency bands
(Table 1).
TABLE 1
Nations have agreed that nations may
manage the spectrum within their own borders as a national resource.
Nations choose to use "their" spectrum in different ways, and provisions
must be made to ensure compatibility among different nations, as
broadcasts and other uses of spectrum often radiate beyond a country's
borders. Beyond national borders the spectrum allocation and the use of
satellite communications are subject to ITU regulation.
Before the mid-1990s communications
satellites mostly utilized the C, L, and Ku-bands. New technologies allow
communications satellites to use both the Ka and Ku-bands more readily to
meet the demands of customers who require faster access to information.
When operating satellite communications
(or other uses of frequency) outside its borders, a government must obtain
Host Nation Approval (HNA) from countries that are affected. The HNA is
established via a bilateral agreement between two governments, or between
the host nation and the service provider in the case of commercial
systems. As well, there must be negotiations over available
transponder2 space on any of a nation's satellites, because the
host nation dictates channel usage. Host nation control and ITU regulation
of frequency allocations impacts flexibility and introduces access risks
to any military service seeking spectrum allocation. The host nation could
deny access to leased transponders, especially during times of political,
diplomatic, or military tension.
2. SATELLITE SERVICES
The effectiveness of a satellite or satellite network is dependent on a
host of factors, including the location of a satellite in one of three
general orbital regimes:
- Low Earth Orbit (LEO) - satellites in LEO orbit the Earth at less than
5500 km altitude; this equates to orbital periods of less than 225
minutes.
- Medium Earth Orbit (MEO) - satellites in MEO orbit the Earth between
LEO and GEO altitudes.
- Geosynchronous (or geostationary) Earth Orbit (GEO) - satellites in
GEO orbit the Earth at an altitude of approximately 36,000 km, and remain
in the same position relative to ground locations; this equates to an
orbital period of approximately 24 hours.
The higher in orbit a satellite is, the larger the area on Earth it can
cover. High orbits, however, lead to a longer transmission time between
Earth and the satellite and a slight delay in voice transmission.
Satellites in a lower orbit have a faster transmission time but their
footprint (coverage area) is smaller.
A second characteristic of a satellite is
its orbital inclination - the angle of the satellite's orbit to the
equator. Satellites that orbit at or near 0 degrees relative to Earth's
equator can provide good coverage to equatorial regions, but polar regions
receive no coverage. On the other hand, satellites at higher angles
relative to earth's equator can reach the polar regions but continuous
communications can only be achieved by increasing the number of satellites
in orbit.
A third parameter of an orbital
constellation is the number of satellites in orbit. Simply put, the more
interconnected satellites there are within a given constellation, the
greater the coverage area and the longer communication can be maintained
with the satellites. These systems tend to be quite costly because they
require more satellites to be effective.
There are two general categories for
satellite communication services:
- Fixed Satellite Services (FSS). Fixed satellite services refer
to communications that are broadcast to users who are fixed in a
particular location. Typically, FSS provides large quantities of video,
imagery, and voice data. Such high capacity transactions are usually
referred to as "wideband" or "broadband" transmissions. FSS constellations
have a relatively small number of satellites in geostationary orbit (GEO).
These systems often cannot reach high latitudes and rely heavily on
stationary ground systems to transmit their signals to fixed and mobile
customers.
- Mobile Satellite Services (MSS). Mobile satellite services,
with satellites in either low or medium earth orbit (L/MEO), serve mobile
users at all latitudes without the use of ground stations for signal
relay. "Little LEO" systems are MSS constellations that provide paging and
messaging capabilities utilizing V/UHF frequencies below 1 GHz. "Big LEO"
systems provide two-way voice and data transmissions in the low UHF
(1-2GHz) band. Such data transactions and are usually referred to as
"narrowband" transmissions. Some MSS constellations provide broadband
services, and are known as "Broadband LEO" systems.
3. BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY TRENDS
The communication satellite industry has
historically been dominated by a model in which consortia of national
governments operate satellite networks and provide services to regional,
national, or local areas. Today, the industry is evolving rapidly toward
private sector dominance - numerous new agreements are creating privately
financed FSS and MSS systems neither owned nor operated by any government.
These new ventures present increased competition for the old model
telecommunications companies, and are forcing the latter either to
privatize or to revamp their services. For example, Inmarsat privatized
its operations in early 1999 and developed a big LEO spin-off, ICO.
Eutelsat has recently launched a broadband satellite service to provide
Internet access. New spin-offs of the old consortia must compete with the
new private services in local markets. Only time will tell what number and
what type of satellite communication systems will be successful and
supported by the market.
4. COMMERCIAL AND MILITARY SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS
Today, satellite communication systems are
often driven by commercial needs more than military needs. However,
military satellite communication (MILSATCOM) is a vital component of
military operations in the modern world. MILSATCOM systems are developed
using the following list of performance parameters:
- Coverage - Ability to provide satellite communications service
when and where needed.
- Capacity - Provide requisite amounts of broadband and
narrowband capabilities.
- Protection - Provide levels of protection over all MILSATCOM
capacities. This usually means providing anti-jam capabilities and
guarding against intercept and detection. Prevention of all unauthorized
access to, or disclosure of, information, and, ability to detect and
neutralize such unauthorized activity.
- Interoperability - Systems, units, and forces should be able to
provide, accept, and use information services from one another quickly and
effectively.
- Access and Control - Services must be immediately available and
accessible for use when and where needed. Control refers to the ability
and mechanisms needed to operate and manage available resources.
- Quality of Service - Systems must provide voice quality that is
intelligible and useable in the intended operational environment, and
information must be transferred with minimal delays.
- Flexibility - The ability to support a range of quickly
changing military operations and missions. Communications must be mobile
and able to use a diverse amount of the frequency spectrum effectively.
This list is both comprehensive, and
similar to a list of capabilities a commercial company might advertise in
its latest product. That is, in a perfect world, a commercial satellite
communications provider would want to market a product that satisfies all
of these performance characteristics. However, commercial providers are
primarily interested in meeting those performance parameters needed to
achieve a profitable product. Thus, they are willing to sacrifice certain
performance parameters (e.g. protection from electromagnetic pulse) in
order to reduce development, launch, initiation, or operational costs, as
long as doing so does not sufficiently depreciate other parameters (e.g.
acceptable quality of service or coverage). The military point of view is
that meeting all performance parameters is necessary to facilitate
operations and save lives. It is not performance parameters that separate
the commercial and military communities, but rather, user needs, and the
perceived trade-off between risks and rewards that results from
sacrificing any single performance parameter.
If it were realistically possible for a
military force (in any nation) to be self-sufficient in satellite
communications, and provide itself with all systems required for
successful operations, than the dilemma spelled out above would be of
little relevance. However, with increasingly military reliance on
satellite communications, military forces are forced to turn to commercial
sources for satellite communication capabilities. It is this circumstance
that gives rise to the term "dual use" or "dual purpose" for technologies
with both civilian and military applications and customers. Cooperation
between the private sector and the government over the acquisition and use
of dual-purpose technologies is an issue of great importance in the United
States. Specifically, the US Department of Defense (DoD) has examined ways
to cooperate with commercial satellite communication firms to ensure that
future generations of commercial satellite communications are more suited
to DoD needs.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Anselmo, Joseph C. "Japan pushes satcom frontier. (Japanese government
planning experimental satellite communications system)", Aviation Week
and Space Technology v147, n16, Oct 20 1997
"APMT terminates Hughes geomobile communications Satellite contract" 15
April 1999, Florida Today Space Online:
http://www.floridatoday.com
"Ariane Launch on Wednesday To Park Telecom 'Bird' Over Asia" 15 Feb 2000,
Space.Com:
http://www.space.com
"Asian Satellite Cell Phone on Target" 26 February 2000, Space.com: http://www.space.com
"Atlas Rocket Successfully Launches Superbird-C Communications Satellite
for Space Communications
Corp. of Japan" 28 July 1997, Florida Today Space Online:
http://www.floridatoday.com
Baker, John C., Johnson Bret, Williamson, Ray A. "U.S. Security Interests
and Dual-Purpose Satellite Technologies: Framing the Policy Issue -
Draft", Space Policy Institute of George Washington University, December
1999
Baker, John C., Williamson, Ray A. "The implications of Emerging Satellite
Information Technologies for Global Transparency and International
Security." Space Policy Institute of George Washington University,
November 1999.
"China Telecom Invests in GlobalStar" 22 April 1998, Florida Today
Space Online:
http://www.floridatoday.com
"Delta 2 rocket set for Cape Canaveral liftoff" 14 January 1996,
Florida Today Space Online: http://www.floridatoday.com
de Selding, Peter "ITU Unable to Keep Pace with Operator Conflicts",
Space News v10, n39, Oct. 18 1999
de Selding, Peter "China Courting Deals with Non-US Firms", Space News
v10, n 43, Nov. 15 1999
Federation of American Scientists' Space Policy Project World Space Guide:
http://www.fas.org/spp/guide
"The Garuda Communucations Satellites" 11 February 2000,
Space.com:
http://www.space.com
GlobalStar Website -
http://www.globalstar.com
Gunston, Bill Janes Aerospace Dictionary, Third Edition, Jane's
Information Group, 1988.
"Hughes-built Indonesian satellite to be launched" 13 May 1996, Florida
Today Space Online: http://www.floridatoday.com
ICO Website -
http://www.ico.com
Iridium Website -
http://www.iridium.com
IntelSat Website - a href="http://www.intelsat.int" target="_top">
http://www.intelsat.int
Johnson, Bret, "The Commercial Mobile Satellite System Dilemma" The Space
Policy Institute of George Washington University, February 2000.
"Koreasat 2 gets a Good Ride to Space on Delta" 15 January 1996,
Florida Today Space Online: http://www.floridatoday.com
"Lockheed Martin-Orbital Sciences team awarded contract to build
satellite for Japan" 8 January 2000,
Florida Today Space Online: http://www.floridatoday.com
"Lockheed Martin Atlas rocket soars for Japan" 16 February 1999,
Florida Today Space Online: http://www.floridatoday.com
"Lockheed Martin-built Koreasat-3 arrives in Kourou for launch" 22 July
1999, Florida Today Space Online: http://www.floridatoday.com
"Lockheed Martin-built TELKOM satellite shipped to Kourou launch site" 5
July 1999, Florida Today Space Online:
http://www.floridatoday.com
McLucas, John L. Space Commerce, Harvard University Press, 1991
Mecham, Micheal "Asia Pacific Leads by Playing 'Catch-Up'", Aviation
Week and Space Technology v147, Aug 11 1997
"Orbital's INDOSTAR-1 Satellite Launched Aboard Ariane 4 Rocket Company's
First Geostationary
Satellite to Provide Indonesia With Complete Direct-to-Home Television
Broadcast Services" 16 November 1997, Florida Today Space Online:
http://www.floridatoday.com
"ORBCOMM now licensed for full commercial service in Malaysia" 22 April
1998, Florida Today Space Online:
http://www.floridatoday.com
"OrbComm Launches Commercial Service in Japan" 5 April 1999 Florida
Today Space Online: http://www.floridatoday.com
"Report to Congress on Impediments to the Innovative Acquisition of
Commercial Satellite
Communications", prepared by Office of the Under Secretary of Defense,
June 1998
OrbComm Website -
http://www.orbcom.net
Silverstein Sam "Asia's Satellite Market Heats Up", Space News v11,
n3, Jan 24 2000
"Superbird Satellite Takes Flight" 17 February 2000, Space.com: http://www.space.com
"Taiwan added to GlobalStar's Worldwide Mobile Satellite Services" 19
September 1998, Florida Today Space Online:
http://www.floridatoday.com
Taverna, Micheal A. "Broadband Services, AsiaSat Stakes Position as Global
Player," Aviation Week and Space Technology v150, n1, Jan 4 1999
US Department of Defense, "Department of Defense (DOD) Candidate
Requirements for Commercial
Satellite Communications (Satcom) Services," prepared by the Defense
Information Systems
Agency, 27 January 1999
Return to Table of Contents.